• Expertise
    • Agribusiness
    Sectors
    Menu
    • Agribusiness
    • Automotive
    • Consumer Goods & Retail
    • Education
    • Food & Beverages
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
    • Information Technology
    Menu
    • Start-ups
    • Textiles, Apparels & Accessories
    Practice Areas
    Menu
    • CORPORATE
      • Antitrust & Competition Law
      • Banking & Finance
      • Capital Markets, REITs & InvITs
      • Corporate Law
      • Commercial Law
      • Family Business
    • EMPLOYMENT LAW
      • Anti Sexual Harassment and Discrimination at Workplace
      • Compliance Audit
      • Disciplinary Proceedings
      • Employment & Termination
      • Health, Safety & Environment
      • Immigration
      • Labour Law
      • Labour & Industrial Disputes
      • ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES
    • Intellectual Property
      • COPYRIGHTS
      • DESIGNS
      • PATENTS
      • TRADEMARK
      • IP TRANSACTIONS
      • MEDIA, ENTERAINMENT & GAMING
      • SPORTS LAW
    • REAL ESTATE
      • Residential, Commercial & Township Development
      • Corporate Real Estate
      • Data Center, Warehousing & Logistics
      • Construction Finance
      • Environment
      • Industrial Unit, Park, SEZ & IT Park
      • Renewable Energy
      • Hospitality
      • RERA
    • DISPUTE RESOLUTION
      • Arbitration
      • Bankruptcy & Insolvency
      • Constitutional Law
      • Consumer Disputes
      • Economic Offences
      • Litigation
      • Mediation
      • Quasi-Judicial Representation
    • TAX
      • Direct Tax
      • Indirect Tax
      • International Tax & Transfer Pricing
      • Tax Litigation & Representation
      • Tax Compliance
    • MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
      • Divestment
      • Joint Venture
      • M&A and Cross Border Transactions
      • Restructuring & Reorganization
      • Strategic Alliance
    Menu
    • TECHNOLOGY LAW
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Cyber Security
      • FinTech
      • Digital(Internet) & E-commerce
      • Privacy & Data Protection
      • Space Law
    • Funds
      • Project Finance, Debt Funding & Restructuring
      • Fund Formation & Structuring
      • Investment Funds
      • Private Equity, Venture Capital & P2P Funding
    • RENEWABLE ENERGY
      • Clean Tech
      • Hydro Power
      • Solar Energy
      • Wind Energy
    • INFRASTRUCTURE & ENERGY
      • Airport
      • Defense & Aviation
      • Healthcare & Education
      • IT & Telecom
      • Logistics & Warehousing
      • Oil & Gas
      • Smart Cities
      • Tourism
      • Thermal Energy
      • Transportation (Roads, Bridges, Railways & Metro)
      • Urban Infra
    • GOVERNMENT, REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE
      • Advisory
      • Corporate Governance
      • FSSAI
      • FDI & ODI
      • Insurance
      • International Trade & WTO
      • PSU Divestment & Tender
      • Public Policy
      • Regulatory Compliance
  • People
  • About FM
Edit Content
  • 125 Years of Trust
  • Blogs
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • FM Foundation
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • 125 Years of Trust
  • Blogs
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • FM Foundation
  • Contact Us

Home / startelevision

In the Battle of Stars, Delhi HC Rules in Favor of Star Television

  • September 20, 2022
  • Shreya Chaddha
  • Prerna Dadu

The Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction in favour of Star Television Productions Limited (Star TV) (Star Television Productions Limited & Anr. V. Eurosport & Ors.) restraining Eurosport, a Warner bros subsidiary, from using the “Eurosport” trademark, tradename or any other mark as being identical/deceptively similar to “Star” marks including the Star device.

Background

Star TV had filed a trademark infringement suit against Eurosport, formerly “Dsport”, Discovery Communications LLC and Discovery Communications India (“Eurosport”). Star TV claimed they had used the Star device and its variants in India since 1991. They contended that Eurosport’s use of the single Star logo with the letter E positioned prominently against the Star was deceptively similar to its registered trademark.  

Eurosport responded by claiming that they have been broadcasting sporting events under the name Eurosport since 1989, thereby making them the prior adopters of the mark. They also argued that they are the only registered proprietors of the impugned trademark and all its variations, which have been in use since 2015 in over 100 jurisdictions without any objections from anyone, including the Plaintiffs.

 

Creative Usage of Common Word

While rejecting Eurosport’s contention, the Court found that the Star logo predated Eurosport’s logo when it first broadcasted its television channel called Star TV in 1992, despite Eurosport adopting a similar logo in 1989 and commencing operations in the European market. The Court observed that Eurosport entered the Indian market only in 2017 and initially as “Dsports” while Star TV had begun expanding its broadcasting operations in India in 1992.

The Court also pointed out that Eurosport had not provided any explanation for using the single Star logo; in contrast, Star TV had chosen the same to be an acronym for “Satellite Television in Asia Region.”

Placing reliance on the observations made by the Apex Court in the cases of Skyline Education Institute (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. SL Vaswan (2010) 2 SCC 142, Surya Agro Oils Ltd. Vs. Surya Coconut Oil Industries 1994 SCC Online Del 266 and Mercy Bigi Vs Sunil Kumar, 2015 SCC OnLine Ker 16947, the Court opined that “A word that is descriptive and in common use for a particular object, by its use, should immediately bring to the mind that object alone. A star to a common person would not connect to an entertainment and sports broadcasting channel. The use of a completely unconnected word and device to represent the broadcasting channels of the plaintiffs is a creative usage of the common word which requires to be protected.”  Hence, “the Plaintiffs (Star TV) have a right to protect the use of a common word in a novel manner.”

The Court added that Star TV’s right to seek its trademark protection in India would not be impeded despite the co-existence of both trademarks in various jurisdictions.

 

Grant of Interim Injunction: Analysis

Under the Trademark law, the suit must satisfy three conditions simultaneously to grant an interim injunction.

  1. Prima facie case,
  2. Irreparable loss and injury suffered by the Plaintiff; and
  3. The balance of convenience tilts in favour of Plaintiff.

The Court reached its decision through the following analysis:

While adjudging a prima facie case in favour of Plaintiff, the Court specifically relied on the settlement reached by both parties back in 2018 in which Eurosport had agreed not to use the single star mark.

Eurosport had entered the Indian sports broadcasting arena under the name “Dsport” after “Discovery” had taken over “Eurosport”. They adopted a Single Star Device embedded in the letter ‘D’. Star TV protested by issuing a legal notice dated March 30, 2017. Both parties reached an agreement wherein Defendant agreed not to adopt a mark with a single star.

It is also pertinent to note that “Dsport” mark with a globe has been registered since August 2015 and that Eurosport has also instituted suits against entities that used the Device of a Globe in their mark to assert exclusive rights to their registered trademark of “Dsport” with a globe.

Therefore, the Court held inter alia that “the facts unequivocally establish that the plaintiffs have established a prima-facie case in their favour. The continued dishonest use of the Single Star by the defendants would cause irreparable loss and injury to the plaintiffs, particularly by diluting the unique use of the word ‘Star’, which is a created word, and the “Star‟ logo by common usage.”

Further, the balance of convenience also laid in favour of Plaintiff’s mark as it had managed to build a strong reputation amongst millions of Indian households that watch Plaintiff’s channel (including sports), thereby acquiring the status of a “well-known” mark under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”), while Eurosport entered the Indian market in 2017, run their sports channel Dsport for only 18 months and adopted the single Star Eurosport name thereafter.

Noting that continued dishonest use of the Single Star logo by Eurosport would cause irreparable loss and injury to Star TV, the Court granted an interim injunction in favour of the Plaintiff before such dishonest practices by the Defendants dilute the unique use and reputation of STAR and the Star logo.

The Judgement can be accessed here.

“A word that is descriptive and in common use for a particular object, by its use, should immediately bring to the mind that object alone. A star to a common person would not connect to an entertainment and sports broadcasting channel. The use of a completely unconnected word and device to represent the broadcasting channels of the plaintiffs is a creative usage of the common word which requires to be protected.”  

Related Posts

Artificial Intelligence

The Curious Case of the Robolawyer (No, it’s not a Perry Mason Novel!)

Shuva Mandal January 16, 2023
Graphical User Interface

Registration of GUI as Designs: Existing Provisions and Challenges

Drishti Kardam January 13, 2023
Online Gaming

Regulating Online Gaming Intermediaries – The Rules and their Implications

Padma Sinha January 11, 2023
Rooh Afza Trademark Infringement

‘Rooh Afza’ has Immense Goodwill: Delhi HC Rules in Trademark Infringement Case

Shreya Chaddha January 9, 2023

POST A COMMENT

Posted in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | Tagged dsports, esports, eurosports, highcourt, infringement, intellectualproperty, iplaws, ipr, starlogo, startelevision, startrademark, trademark
  • 125 Years of Trust
  • Blogs
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • FM Foundation
  • Contact Us
Follow Us:

© 2023 Fox Mandal Foundation. All rights reserved.
Powered by Origamicreative
Disclaimer Privacy Policy

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner.

This website is meant solely for the purpose of providing general information and not for advertising or soliciting any work whether directly or indirectly. By accessing this website, www.foxmandal.in, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Fox Mandal of your own accord. Further, any content provided in this website should not be construed as legal advice. We disclaim all liability for any consequences of any action taken by the user relying on content provided on the website.

By clicking on the “I Accept” button, the user acknowledges that:

  •  she/he wishes to gain more information about Fox Mandal;
  • there has been no invitation, inducement or advertisement of any sort whatsoever to solicit any work through this website; and
  • She/he is aware that our website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance by analysing traffic to the website and she/he agrees to our use of cookies.

To learn more about how we use cookies, please read our Privacy Policy

I Accept