Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Government Incentives for Infrastructure Development

India is emerging to become a global leader in investing in world-class infrastructure projects, in view of concrete plans set out in the 2021 Budget. With unwavering growth in the Indian stock market witnessed by indexes touching unprecedented highs, the Indian infrastructure sector is filled with signs of optimism as the country reels out from the effects of the pandemic. Current trends suggest a boost in infrastructure spending that shall also facilitate infusion of overseas capita for investments in other sectors and an availability of credit for infrastructure projects.

The government’s National Infrastructure Plan for 2019 to 2025 has already supported more than 9000 projects having a total project cost surpassing USD 1949 billion.[1] The National Infrastructure Pipeline is a live database of infrastructure projects and provides attractive investment opportunities in projects worth more than INR 100 crores in sectors including Transport, Logistics, Energy, Water and Sanitation, Communication, Social and Commercial Infrastructure.[2]

 

Apart from this, opportunities are available through the government’s ‘India Investment Grid’ (IIG) for investing in stressed assets to allow the purchase of viable stressed assets which have the potential for being turned around.[3] IIG also facilitates Corporate Social Responsibility opportunities for businesses to invest in infrastructure building in the education, healthcare sectors and for poverty alleviation as part of their CSR spending.[4]

These investment opportunities are coupled with a bold move towards introducing National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development Act, 2021. The long-overdue initiative establishes a government-owned Development Finance Institution (DFI) for extending long-term affordable debt financing to infrastructure projects. The DFI is set to receive initial funding from the government and is projected to have a lending capability of a minimum of INR 5 trillion by 2024-25. The appointment of the veteran banker, Mr. K V Kamath as the chairperson of the newly set up INR 20,000 crore DFI- National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development, falls in alignment with the developmental and financial objectives of DFI.

The INR 40, 000 crore National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) anchored by the Government of India in 2015 is also gaining momentum through its funds namely, Master Fund, Fund of Funds and Strategic Opportunities Fund each with a designated purpose.

 

Impetus has been given to the domestic manufacturing ecosystem through the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative, especially to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) aiming to facilitate local manufacturing. As a further boost to the initiative, the government intends to achieve a turnover of US$ 25 billion including export of US$ 5 billion in aerospace and defense goods and services by 2025[5]. An increase in the capital expenditure will augment the procurement of weapons, aircraft, warships, and other military hardware. Posing as a lucrative market for defense companies, India gives orders worth US$ 100 billion a year for defense procurement.[6] Therefore, the Finance Ministry has permitted Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the defense for sector up to 74 percent under the automatic route leading to access of modern technology, strategic partnerships between foreign manufactures and defense equipment manufacturers in India. It also promotes active utilization of the Technology of Funds scheme that supports MSMEs in catering to the requirements of technological development in the defense sector.  

 

With a capital infusion of INR 1,000 crores to Solar Energy Corporation of India, there is a likely surge in large-scale solar installations, grid-connected projects, solar plants, and solar parks along with a phased manufacturing plan for solar cells, solar panels, and domestic production of solar inverters and solar lanterns.

 

The Government of India has also earmarked areas including highways, railways, power grids, and airports to monetize public infrastructure for financing new public projects. Statutory authorities have already begun setting up infrastructure investment trusts (InvIT) which will hold the public infrastructure assets for national as well as international institutional investors. Another avenue under consideration for obtaining public investment into infrastructure projects is issuance of tax-efficient zero-coupon bonds by infrastructure debt funds.

 

Major tenders worth more than INR 20 billion are expected to be issued in the coming financial year for public-private partnership in the management and operations of ports.

 

The logistics sector serves national trade, international trade, MSMEs, and start-ups. The launch of INR 100 crore Gati Shakti National Master Plan for Multi-Modal Connectivity has heralded new possibilities. This digital platform will incorporate the infrastructure schemes of various Ministries and State Governments like Bharatmala, Sagarmala, inland waterways, dry/land ports, UDAN etc; Economic Zones like textile clusters, pharmaceutical clusters, defense corridors, electronic parks, industrial corridors, fishing clusters, Agri zones will be covered to improve connectivity and make Indian businesses more competitive[7]. The National Logistics Policy is expected to promote seamless movement of goods through a focus on digitization, process re-engineering, multi-modal transport, EXIM trade, etc.[8] It is designed to streamline rules and address supply-side constraints, leading to lower logistics costs, the boost of trade, enhancement of Logistics Performance Index and greater competitiveness for Indian products worldwide.

 

In the power sector, apart from an INR 3 trillion outlay planned over the coming five years for revamping the power distribution scheme by providing distribution companies with financial assistance for developing a smart-metering infrastructure, the government is also in the advanced stages of launching a National Hydrogen Mission which may provide an opportunity for corporations in the power sector to engage in the export of green hydrogen and green ammonia while also meeting the domestic demand.

 

These dynamic initiatives clubbed with the use of India’s IT capabilities by creating monitoring mechanisms such as a dashboard to track the progress of publicly monetized infrastructure projects have created attractive opportunities for infrastructure companies to mobilize their assets into the establishment of new development projects.

 

Fox Mandal’s Infrastructure, Project Finance, and Energy Teams deliver unmatched expert services in wide-ranging areas of public infrastructure, inclusive of but not limited to ; transaction assistance for infrastructure projects, services of review, compliance, submitting tender documents, structuring and reviewing concession agreements, incorporation of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), procuring relevant licenses and approvals, regulatory clearance facilitation, dispute resolution, strategy planning, and infrastructure contract bidding management.

 

As a commendation for the services rendered by Fox Mandal, the Firm featured in 2021 Legal 500 Rankings for its Projects & Energy Practice vertical.  

 

References: 

[1] https://indiainvestmentgrid.gov.in/national-infrastructure-pipeline

[2] https://indiainvestmentgrid.gov.in/opportunities/nip-projects/transport and https://indiainvestmentgrid.gov.in/national-infrastructure-pipeline

[3] https://indiainvestmentgrid.gov.in/opportunities/stressed-assets/transport?subSector=112%2C37%2C110%2C108%2C109%2C107%2C106%2C111%2C113

[4] https://indiainvestmentgrid.gov.in/opportunities/csr-projects?sector=29%2C10&subSector=97%2C99%2C157%2C94%2C100%2C93%2C102%2C105%2C96%2C95%2C103%2C104%2C98%2C112%2C37%2C110%2C108%2C109%2C107%2C106%2C111%2C113

[5] https://www.investindia.gov.in/sector/defence-manufacturing

[6] https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/higher-fdi-in-defence-sector-to-attract-mncs-give-make-in-india-a-boost-120051900698_1.html

[7] https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1763638

[8] https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/logistics-and-supply-chain-trends-for-2021/article36366467.ece

 

Image Credits: 

Photo by David Rodrigo on Unsplash

These dynamic initiatives clubbed with the use of India’s IT capabilities by creating monitoring mechanisms such as a dashboard to track the progress of publicly monetized infrastructure projects have created attractive opportunities for infrastructure companies to mobilize their assets into the establishment of new development projects.

POST A COMMENT

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Anatomy of Risks in PPP Projects in India and How to Mitigate Them?

The infrastructure space has always been a capital-intensive sector. Particularly for a developing country such as India, the unique financing and project implementation models that Public-Private Partnerships (“PPP”) represent is considerable for enabling the construction of large-scale public infrastructure projects with significant long-term economic value and ensuring necessary infrastructure development is undertaken in the country.

However, considering the long timelines, involvement of multiple stakeholders, and significant capital expenditure in infrastructure projects, there are significant risks associated with them that are likely to emerge at any phase of the project. So far, in India, PPP seems to be the only viable model for the implementation of public infrastructure projects in an otherwise cash-strapped economy.

In this article, we will briefly discuss the broad phases of any PPP project, associated risks and the suggested risk mitigation measures.

Phases of a PPP Project

The broad phases of a PPP project are as below:

Phases of PPP ProjectEach of these phases is critical for ensuring the long-term success of viable PPP projects. In brief, the following activities are undertaken in each of these phases.

  1. Phase 1 (PPP Bidding Phase): Subsequent to the requisite feasibility studies by the government, the potential PPP project is given the go-ahead, commencing the bidding phase. As a first step to the bidding process, the authority issues an Expression of Interest (“EOI”) and/or a Request for Quote (“RFQ”) and/or a Request for Proposal (“RFP”), followed by the preparation of a Concession Agreement (“CA”). The highest bidder is chosen, the project is awarded to the successful bidder and the CA is executed thereafter. Post the issuance of the Letter of Award to the successful bidder, several procedures are to be followed, such as achieving financial closure, undertaking technical planning and design, obtaining necessary permits and approvals, and establishing a proper team for implementing the project.
  2. Phase 2 (PPP Development Phase): The next phase is the construction phase, where the project is implemented. After the construction of the facilities is completed, the authority inspects. If the inspection is satisfactory, it declares the project ready for operation and sets the commercial operation date (“COD”).
  3. Phase 3 (PPP Operation & Maintenance): Following the COD declaration, this phase designates a project in operation, which includes maintenance during the operation phase.

 

Risks and Their Mitigation Mechanisms

The most common and significant risks in PPP are:

  1. Delays in land acquisition or rights of way – This is one of the most critical risks in every PPP project. When the land acquisition processes fail, timely access to sites and other subsequent formalities stand compromised leading to unwarranted delays in the development project.
  2. Delays in obtaining relevant approvals/permits – Prior to large scale construction projects being commenced, there is a requirement to obtain different types of permits and approvals for commencing such activities, such as environmental clearance, permits for moving civic activities to other locations, etc.
  3. Design Risk – Usually means a faulty design that does not meet predetermined parameters of the facility, requiring changes, resulting in time and cost overruns.
  4. Inflation Risk – Inflation leads to an overall increase in the price of raw materials, transportation costs and general costs of services. This is aggravated by undue delays in projects translating to an increase in the overall project cost.
  5. Revenue/Demand Risk – This is where the forecasted revenue for the project and/or the potential that can be generated has been improperly projected or based on outdated data, thereby affecting the viability of the project.
  6. Construction/Completion Risk/Time and Cost Overruns Risk – One of the major risks in PPP project that causes delays in achieving COD is delays in construction and eventual completion.
  7. Financial Risk – Difficulty in raising project finances or raising very expensive financing that may not be feasible in the long run. Read a detailed analysis of the Project Cost in Infrastructure Projects
  8. Operational Risk – Inefficiencies in operating costs, lead to higher operating costs, arresting leakage of revenue.
  9. Political/Regulatory Risk – Changes in political and/or regulatory regimes that result in project devaluation, lower revenues or faulty project implementation.
  10. Performance/Default/Termination Risk – When the private contractor or consortium is responsible for investing funds in the project’s execution and becomes insolvent or undertakes faulty construction and erection of facilities due to lack of expertise on the part of the private contractor.
  11. Asset Value/Technology Obsolescence Risk – Occurs when the technology is not a proven one or when the asset value decreases significantly owing to policy or regulatory changes.
  12. Social and Environmental Risks – The project affects the local environment in the region of construction or has a significantly adverse collateral impact on the local population in the region, thereby creating obstacles in the implementation of the project or increasing time and cost overruns.
  13. Absence of renegotiation clause in CA – This is one of the oldest demands of many concessionaires in any PPP project in India, which is yet to be addressed by the authorities. As CA is valid for a longer duration, sometimes lasting 30 years, no concessionaire is in a position to perceive risk which may affect the project during the length of the entire concession period. The authorities should provide the necessary mechanisms for renegotiation of long-term PPP contracts.

Now we shall examine a few case studies that would demonstrate any combination of the above set of risk factors.

Case Study 1: Delhi – Gurgaon Expressway[1]

The National Highways Authority of India (“NHAI”) was entrusted with the task of executing the golden quadrilateral project wherein the four metro cities were sought to be connected. The Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway stretch of the golden quadrilateral project was to be executed via the Build, Operate and Transfer (“BOT”) method and was awarded to a consortium of Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. and DS Constructions Ltd. Right from the start, there were several issues with the execution of the project. They’re discussed as below.

  1. Land acquisition – NHAI was responsible for granting the right of way to the concessionaire, which was delayed significantly, leading to a delay in developing and a consequential delay in commissioning the project.

Mitigation mechanism: NHAI should not bid out any project until 90 % of the land is acquired and subsequent possession is taken over.

  1. Approvals – The obtaining of permits/approvals is another important risk to be addressed. NHAI shall assist the bidder in facilitating the said approval within the stipulated time as envisaged in the CA.

Mitigation mechanism: To speed-up the process, the government could have constituted a single authority that the concessionaire could approach to expeditiously obtain all the required permits/approvals.

  1. Design & Social Risk – Such large-scale projects possess the capability of displacing and affecting multiple lives and families.

Mitigation mechanism: Large-scale public consultations involving affected families and relevant government agencies should have been conducted prior to the commencement of the project, to mitigate their concerns and ascertain viable steps forward.

  1. Technology Risk – NHAI generally relied on older traffic studies to predict the volume of traffic to arrive at bid numbers. This was a gross underestimation of the eventual flow of traffic, leading to an improper estimation of traffic numbers.

Mitigation mechanism: NHAI should use the latest technology and traffic studies to finalise the bid numbers.

Case Study 2: Vadodara Halol Toll Road[2]

The Vadodara Halol Toll Road was one of the first projects involving the widening of state highways and commenced under the aegis of the Government of Gujarat. The Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (“IL&FS”) was roped in by the Government of Gujarat to develop the road project. A special purpose vehicle (“SPV”) was incorporated for this purpose and the project was developed using the Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (“BOOT”) model. Considering that the World Bank was one of the investors in this project, high standards of execution and implementation were followed, and this project turned out to be an example of best practises followed to mitigate various types of risks. The same is discussed below, along with a few mitigation strategies where appropriate.

  1. Environmental and Social Risk: One of the significant plus points of this project was the extensive environmental and social impact assessment that was undertaken during the project development phase itself. As per initial reports, around 300 families would have been affected by the initial plan of the project. However, intense public consultations were held at the development stage of the project and bypasses and various alternatives were introduced and the number of affected households was eventually reduced to 10. The project also complied with the environmental and social norms by creating wetlands, reducing emissions, constructing pedestrian subways, planting 550 trees across the sides of the roads, creating noise barriers at sensitive receptors and deepening the waterbodies in some villages along the project site.
  2. Policy Risk: The drop in revenues because of eventual changes in government policies certainly affected the concessionaire’s ability to recover their investment from the project.

Mitigation mechanism: Robust consultations and even ongoing consultations with several government departments and agencies to ensure government incentives to increase road traffic in this area might have been useful in mitigating this policy risk and enabling the project to recoup its initial investments.

  1. Financial Innovation / Risk: This is one of the first projects where innovative financing mechanisms were adopted such as the use of Deep Discount Bonds with the option of take-out financing, cumulative convertible preference shares and long-term loans from IL&FS. The project created several such examples of innovative financing, which were eventually replicated in other projects in the infrastructure industry.

Conclusion

In light of the discussed range of risks that one may encounter during the entire lifecycle of PPP projects and their potential impact; it is pertinent that the authorities approach every PPP project in every sector as a partnership and weighs the inputs of all the relevant stakeholders. If the government proactively strategizes to remove the unidirectional nature of PPP CAs in India, and both the private partner and the authorities work in resonance, the current risks plaguing the PPP project will be resolved, resulting in an active involvement and interest from the private sector in participating in PPP projects in India.

References:

[1] See “Case Study 8: Delhi Gurgaon Expressway” in Public Private Partnerships in India – A Compendium of Case Studies, available at https://www.pppinindia.gov.in/toolkit/pdf/case_studies.pdf. Last visited on November 1, 2021

[2] See “Case Study 6: Vadodara Halol Toll Road” in Public Private Partnerships in India – A Compendium of Case Studies, available at https://www.pppinindia.gov.in/toolkit/pdf/case_studies.pdf. Last visited on November 1, 2021

Image Credits:

Photo by Lance Anderson on Unsplash

Considering the long timelines, involvement of multiple stakeholders, and significant capital expenditure in infrastructure projects, there are significant risks associated with them that are likely to emerge at any phase of the project. So far, in India, PPP seems to be the only viable model for the implementation of public infrastructure projects in an otherwise cash-strapped economy.

POST A COMMENT