The administration of a country makes headway with fiscal reforms when the revenue framework starts hindering effectiveness. Further, the redesigning of tax administration is done to widen the tax base and to achieve budgetary objectives.>>

Consumers, especially individuals and small buyers, who were at the short end of the bargain when it came to market operations can now seek respite in the new consumer law which significantly turns the table in their favour. Further, the rapid development of technology and e-commerce has posed considerable challenges to adequate protection of consumers’ rights. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (“Act”) acknowledges these challenges and marks the commencement of an era of consumer rights which are in tandem with the changing dynamics of the new-age consumer expectations thereby making consumers the king in the true sense. The Act was notified on 9^th August, 2019 and it came into force on 20^th July, 2020, repealing and replacing the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“earlier Act”). The Act aims at revamping the process of resolution and settlement of consumer disputes to make it timelier and more effective.>>

To mitigate the economic hardship caused due to COVID-19 pandemic and to facilitate ease of doing business, various efforts are being made by the Government of India. In furtherance of these initiatives, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) has brought about certain relaxations for companies vide its general circular no. 13/2020 dated 30^th March 2020 (“Circular”). The relaxation enables companies to regularize compliance related filing with the Registrar of Companies ( “Registrar”).>>

The term ‘Force majeure’ literally translates from French as ‘superior force’. It's a common clause in legal contracts that allows either party to limit their liability in the face of some unforeseeable, extraordinary event. In English, the term is often used in line with its literal French meaning, but it has other uses as well, including one that has roots in a principle of French law. It is related to the concept of an act of God, an event for which no party can be held accountable.>>

India is making some major headway towards providing universal health coverage. However, a significant challenge is the limited number of qualified doctors and other healthcare professionals available in our country. Telemedicine is a solution to this limitation as it allows consultation, diagnosis, and treatment by healthcare professionals from remote locations with the help of technology. The requirement of telemedicine was starkly visible during the current COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant lockdown. It significantly helped in reducing hospital visits, waiting period and long travel to and from the hospital. Other benefits of telemedicine include timely and faster access to healthcare services, convenience, cost-saving and adequate documentation of health records. Until recently, there was no legislation or guidelines on how telemedicine could be practiced in India. In view of the current pandemic, the Government of India has timely come up with the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines on 25^th March 2020.  This guideline forms a part of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, and is numbered Appendix-5. With this, there is now some legitimacy attached to the service and the guidelines would pave the way for a statutory legislation on the same lines in future.>>

With the digital movement coming of age, the scope of copyright protection has expanded in the past year to a notch higher and effective regulations have been launched to deal with the expansion. Some of the essential legislation and rulings are stated hereunder:>>

India moved up one spot up in terms of trademark filings from its previous year’s ranking according to the World Intellectual Property Indicators published in October 2019^[1]. The report also pointed out a large increase in trademark filing activity in India i.e. more than 20.9% with resident filing activity overwhelmingly contributing to the double-digit growth. Having remained below 100,000 until 2006, India’s trademark annual filings now exceed 320,000.>>

With land or property related litigation accounting for two-thirds of all civil cases pending in the Indian courts, evidence to establish legal title has taken a centre stage. Conflicting laws, administrative incompetence, and a lack of awareness among the population is clogging the judicial pipeline. Courts havetherefore been conferred with multiple opportunities to analysethe legal implicationsofthe various documents involved in property transaction and an unwavering opinion on thelack of standing of ‘Revenue Records’ in an ownership claim has emerged.>>

Land Acquisition in India – A Tough Balancing Act

Sovereigns across the globe have relied upon the doctrine of eminent domain to acquire land for public use. Consent of those who own the land takes a backseat when the greater good is at stake. Guided by this utilitarian principle and to usher a sense of equality among the economically weaker citizens of this nation, ‘right to property’ was removed as a fundamental right through the 44^th amendment. However, democracy demands people-pleasing and power mongers have to give in once in a while for a euphoric sense of justice to prevail. Consequently, the doctrine of eminent domain was balanced through the introduction of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlements Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR Act). The act empowered central and state governments to acquire lands for the development of public good with ‘consent’.>>

A clause for Alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is incorporated in a contract to ensure avoidance of lengthy and costly legal procedures. Undue delay in arbitration procedure tends to vitiate this essential objective that ADR seeks to achieve.  Further, the ADR process is designed to minimize the interference of courts, however, it is more of fiction as parties unhappy with the outcome of the process take the legal recourse as a dilatory tactic. Therefore, it is essential that arbitral awards are set aside only when there is a grave injustice or is unreasonable on the face of it^[i].>>